Skip to main content
· 8/25/1997

Creech v. South Carolina Wildlife & Marine Resources Department

Citations

  • 491 S.E.2d 571
  • 328 S.C. 24

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a dock without a guard rail on one side was an open and obvious condition, but that the defendant should have anticipated the harm
  • holding that appellate court cannot address an issue unless the issue was raised to and ruled upon by the trial court
  • holding that an issue cannot be raised for the first time on appeal, but must have been raised to and ruled upon by the trial court to be preserved for appellate review
  • holding the appellant's failure to raise a particular issue in its directed verdict motion precludes appellate review of that issue
  • holding comparison of a plaintiffs negligence with that of the defendant is a question of fact for the jury to decide
  • holding comparison of plaintiffs negligence with that of defendant is question of fact for jury to decide

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Toal, Finney, Moore, Waller, Gregory

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.