Utah Supreme Court· 12/17/1993

State v. Larsen

Citations

865 P.2d 1355
228 Utah Adv. Rep. 3
1993 Utah LEXIS 157
1993 WL 523544

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

recognizing that \the Utah legislature has not required the courts to interpret the Utah Uniform Securities Act in lockstep with federal decisions\
explaining that willfulness is a \highly culpable mental state\ and \is not consistent with 'strict lability \
directing that in construing a statute’s provisions, courts are bound by its plain language
determining that an expert’s opinion testimony “that some of the material that [the defendant] had omitted from the securities documents could have been important or significant to an investor” was admissible
determining that an expert's opinion testimony \that some of the material that [the defendant] had omitted from the securities documents could have been important or significant to an investor\ was admissible
upholding admission of testimony in securities fraud case that information was \material\ because term could be defined in two ways, one of which involved a factual issue rather than a legal conclusion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Zimmerman, Howe, Durham, Frederick, Rokich, Hall, Stewart

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

102 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

32 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named State v. Larsen

60 other CourtListener records share this case name; the 50 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.