Skip to main content
· 7/23/2002

Prince v. Bear River Mutual Insurance Co.

Citations

  • 2002 UT 68
  • 56 P.3d 524
  • 452 Utah Adv. Rep. 50
  • 2002 Utah LEXIS 94
  • 2002 WL 1610562

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Under Utah law, if an insurer denies an ‘insured’s claim [that] is fairly debatable, [then] the insurer is entitled to debate it and cannot be held to have breached the implied covenant if it chooses to do so.”
  • “A ‘debatable reason,’ for purposes of determining whether [an] insurer may be subjected to bad-faith liability, means an arguable reason, a reason that is open to dispute or question,” (quoting 14 Lee R. Russ & Thomas F. Segalla, Couch on Ins, § 204:28 (3d ed. 1999)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Russon, Durham, Durrant, Howe, Wilkins, Russons

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.