Skip to main content

Newton v. State

Citations

  • 301 S.W.3d 315
  • 2009 WL 2644004

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion by admitting extraneous- offense evidence where half of the factors favored exclusion and the other half favored admission
  • explaining that extraneous offense was^ sufficiently similar, in part, because both victims were same age when abuse started and because abuse lasted for several years
  • determining that inherent probative value of remote but similar extraneous offense weighed “only slightly in favor of admissibility”
  • holding that while extraneous- offense evidence was remote, it was nevertheless probative and that the State’s need for such evidence was “considerable” when there were no eyewitnesses and no physical evidence available to corroborate child-sex-abuse complainant’s testimony
  • determining that inherent probative value of remote but similar extraneous offense weighed “slightly in favor of admissibility” despite 25-year gap between extraneous offense and charged offense
  • acknowledging that “sexually related bad acts and misconduct involving children are inherently inflammatory

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gray, Reyna, Davis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

116 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

30 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.