Newsome v. Farer

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that pro se 3 1 litigants are held to the same standards as members of the Bar
• holding that pro se litigants are held to 18 the same standards as members of the Bar
• holding that pro se litigants are held to the “same standard of conduct and 2 compliance with court rules, procedures, and orders as are members of the bar”
• holding that pro se 21 litigants are held to the “same standard of conduct and compliance with court rules, 22 procedures, and orders as are members of the bar”
• holding that 11 pro se litigants are held to the “same standard of conduct and compliance with court 12 rules, procedures, and orders as are members of the bar”
• rejecting a due process challenge to an order of dismissal, and concluding that such an order under Rule 1-041(B) for failure to comply with a court order was not an adjudication on the merits, and neither notice nor a hearing were required

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).