New Mexico Supreme Court· 4/25/1995
McDowell v. Napolitano
Citations
- 895 P.2d 218
- 119 N.M. 696
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that exhaustion requirement did not bar litigation of the plaintiff’s claim because he substantially complied with grievance process
- holding that exhaustion requirement did not bar litigation of the plaintiffs claim because he substantially complied with grievance process
- stating that an appellate court will only find that the trial court abused its discretion by admitting evidence “when the [trial] court’s decision is without logic or reason, or ... is clearly unable to be defended” (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)
- exhaustion of administrative remedies is absolute when a claim is first cognizable by administrative agency, and judicial interference is withheld until administrative policy has run its course
- exhaustion doctrine not absolute because plaintiff substantially complied with grievance procedures and had already appealed to highest authority at university
- “The doctrine of exhaustion of remedies is absolute where a claim is cognizable in the first instance by an administrative agency alone.... [Jjudieial interference is withheld until the administrative process has run its course.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Baca, Ransom, Franchini
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
18 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Smith v. City of Santa FeNew Mexico Supreme Court· 2007-09-28· cited 118×
- Neiman v. Yale UniversitySupreme Court of Connecticut· 2004-07-20· cited 65×
- Enriquez v. CochranNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1998-07-30· cited 61×
- Sonntag v. ShawNew Mexico Supreme Court· 2001-04-19· cited 61×
- Barreras v. State Corrections DepartmentNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2002-12-09· cited 59×
- Gallegos v. State Board of EducationNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1997-03-26· cited 43×
- Callahan v. New Mexico Federation of Teachers-TVINew Mexico Supreme Court· 2006-03-27· cited 41×
- Norwest Bank New Mexico, N.A. v. Chrysler Corp.New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1999-04-09· cited 33×
- Vaccaro v. City of OmahaNebraska Court of Appeals· 1998-01-20· cited 30×
- Guest v. Allstate InsuranceNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2009-02-17· cited 24×
- Phelps Dodge Tyrone, Inc. v. New Mexico Water Quality Control CommissionNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2006-07-19· cited 24×
- U S West Communications, Inc. v. New Mexico State Corp.New Mexico Supreme Court· 1998-09-15· cited 9×
- Leach v. New Mexico Junior CollegeNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2002-02-19· cited 6×
- Howard University v. Roberts-WilliamsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2012-02-23· cited 6×
- Anderson v. StateNew Mexico Supreme Court· 2022-08-25· cited 6×
- Santa Fe Village Venture v. City of AlbuquerqueD. New Mexico· 1995-08-30· cited 5×
- Lucero v. Board of RegentsNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2012-04-20· cited 1×
- Lucero v. UNM Bd. of RegentsNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2012-03-01
Cites
23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Connick Ex Rel. Parish of Orleans v. MyersSupreme Court· 1983-04-20· cited 5,562×
- United States v. Western Pacific RailroadSupreme Court· 1956-12-03· cited 1,533×
- Smith v. MaschnerTenth Circuit· 1990-03-29· cited 396×
- San Filippo v. BongiovanniThird Circuit· 1994-08-18· cited 161×
- Newsome v. FarerNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1985-10-30· cited 92×
- McKay v. HammockTenth Circuit· 1984-03-30· cited 73×
- Altman v. HurstSeventh Circuit· 1984-05-18· cited 70×
- State v. PenningtonNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1993-03-16· cited 61×
- Gandy v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court· 1994-03-31· cited 45×
- Cottonwood Estates, Inc. v. Paradise Builders, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court· 1981-02-04· cited 43×
- State Ex Rel. Norvell v. Arizona Public Service Co.New Mexico Supreme Court· 1973-05-18· cited 33×
- Lowery v. AtterburyNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1992-01-06· cited 31×
- Garrett v. HowdenNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1963-12-23· cited 25×
- Moore v. Taylor Concrete & Supply Co., Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1989-12-20· cited 25×
- Hansen v. Skate Ranch, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1982-02-04· cited 24×
- Pan American Petroleum Corp. v. El Paso Natural Gas Co.New Mexico Supreme Court· 1966-12-27· cited 23×
- Hudson v. OteroNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1969-09-22· cited 20×
- First National Bank v. McBrideNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1915-05-24· cited 19×
- Snitow v. Rutgers UniversitySupreme Court of New Jersey· 1986-03-17· cited 17×
- Weinberger v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1983-11-21· cited 13×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.