McDowell v. Napolitano

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that exhaustion requirement did not bar litigation of the plaintiff’s claim because he substantially complied with grievance process
• holding that exhaustion requirement did not bar litigation of the plaintiffs claim because he substantially complied with grievance process
• stating that an appellate court will only find that the trial court abused its discretion by admitting evidence “when the [trial] court’s decision is without logic or reason, or ... is clearly unable to be defended” (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)
• exhaustion of administrative remedies is absolute when a claim is first cognizable by administrative agency, and judicial interference is withheld until administrative policy has run its course
• exhaustion doctrine not absolute because plaintiff substantially complied with grievance procedures and had already appealed to highest authority at university
• “The doctrine of exhaustion of remedies is absolute where a claim is cognizable in the first instance by an administrative agency alone.... [Jjudieial interference is withheld until the administrative process has run its course.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).