Skip to main content
Fifth Circuit· 9/15/2008

Newby v. Enron Corp.

Citations

  • 542 F.3d 463
  • 2008 WL 4113964

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that claims based on misrepresentations allegedly made in 1983 accrued based on plaintiff’s actual knowledge of event that occurred in 1987
  • defining \nonrecurring charge\ as \income statement item that is either unusual in nature or infrequent in occurrence\
  • “[A] court need not grant leave to amend when the filing would be futile because the proposed claims are time-barred.”
  • “[A] court need not grant leave to amend when the filing would be futile because the proposed claims are time-barred.”
  • “[A] court need not grant leave to amend when the filing would be futile because the proposed claims are time-barred.”
  • “[A] court need not grant leave to amend when the filing would be futile because the proposed claims are time-barred.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Smith, Prado, Ludlum

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

23 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.