Gillig v. Nike, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “at least in the content of a civil lawsuit involving business matters, 22 a written marital communication may not be privileged if it is an ‘ordinary business 23 communication’ and it does not have some other indication of confidentiality”
• applying exception when husband and wife and “their company” were being sued
• “The res judicata doctrine does not apply to new rights acquired during the action which might have been, but which were not, litigated.” (italics omitted)
• res judicata does not apply to “new rights acquired during the action which might have been, but which were not, litigated.”
• res judicata does not apply to “new rights acquired during the action which might have been, but which were not, litigated.”
• prior action dismissed for lack of standing; unclear if dismissal was with or without prejudice

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).