Keith C. Moore v. State of Indiana, Indiana Department of Corrections and Thomas D. Richards

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a motion for leave to amend “tolls the statute of limitations, even though technically the amended complaint will not be filed until the court rules on the motion”
• finding under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7(b) that \[a]ll motions...must set forth with particularity the relief or order requested and the ground supporting the application\
• affirming denial of leave to amend complaint because such amendment would be futile, in that proposed new claims would be properly dismissed as time-barred under Rule 12(b)(6)
• whether a plaintiff may amend his complaint to add new defendants after the statute of limitations has run
• “[T]he court should not allow the plaintiff to amend his complaint when to do so would be futile.”
• liability under Section 1983 must be based on personal responsibility, not respondeat superior

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).