Bell v. Showa Denko K.K.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that limitations began to run as soon as plaintiffs associated their symptoms with the ingestion of a nutritional supplement that caused the disease
• explaining that “whether a plaintiff discovered, or should have discovered, an injury is a question of fact which should be submitted to the trier of fact”
• declining to toll the Texas statute If limitation by a personal injury class action filed in New Mexico, as a matter of policy jnd because it was not properly preserved for appeal
• declining to adopt cross-jurisdictional tolling in any event, but observing that such tolling would not apply to defendants who were not named as defendants in the first class action
• As discussed infra, the court also rejected the tolling contention advanced here.
• As discussed infra, the court also rejected the tolling contention advanced here.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).