Ninth Circuit· 9/19/1990

Nevada v. Watkins

Citations

914 F.2d 1545

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

deeming a Presentment Clause challenge “unpersuasive in view of the fact . . . that [a reconciliation bill] was passed in accordance with” the clause
rejecting Nevada’s equal footing challenge to the 1987 amendments to the NWPA
rejecting Nevada’s equal footing challenge to the 1987 amendments to the NWPA
“[T]he Privileges and Immunities Clause [of Article IV] has been construed as a limitation on the powers of the States, not on the powers of the federal government.”
\[T]he tenth amendment does not protect a State from being out-voted in Congress.... Nor can Nevada complain that its lack of representation on the Conference Committee created a defect in the political process.\
“[T]he tenth amendment does not protect a State from being out-voted in Congress.... Nor can Nevada complain that its lack of representation on the Conference Committee created a defect in the political process.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Alarcon, Wallace, Wiggins

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

27 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

48 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Nevada v. Watkins

8 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.