Nelson v. Nelson
Syllabus
In this cross-appeal arising from an action for divorce, Harrison Shelby Nelson (Husband) appeals the family court's final order and final amended order. Melissa Star Nelson (Wife) appeals the family court's order granting Husband's motion pursuant to Rule 60(b) of the South Carolina Rules of Civil Procedure. On appeal, Husband argues the family court erred in (1) finding the parties' property at 6 Judith Street had no mortgage (2) valuing the property at 6 Judith Street (3) finding Husband had a 50% ownership interest in 6 Judith Street (4) valuing parties' property at 109 North Shelmore Boulevard (5) failing to equitably divide the parties' debt (6) including a vehicle owned by Wife's father as a marital asset and the loan to finance that vehicle as a marital debt (7) making numerous findings not supported by the record (8) failing to credit Husband for using the sale of proceeds from an investment property at 18 Reid Street for marital purposes (9) failing to equitably divide the parties' personal property and (10) requiring Husband to contribute to Wife's attorney's fees. In her cross-appeal, Wife argues the family court erred in (1) finding excusable neglect existed to grant Husband's Rule 60(b) motion (2) causing her unfair prejudice by granting Husband's Rule 60(b) motion and (3) failing to find Husband was estopped from seeking relief under Rule 60(b) due to his own bad conduct. We affirm.
Cites
20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Wilder Corp. v. WilkeSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1998-03-09· cited 665×
- Lewis v. LewisSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2011-05-09· cited 543×
- Simmons v. SimmonsSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2011-05-09· cited 337×
- Glasscock v. GlasscockSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1991-03-11· cited 284×
- Stoney v. SRSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2017-12-20· cited 175×
- Curtis v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2001-07-17· cited 152×
- South Carolina Department of Transportation v. First Carolina Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2007-02-27· cited 147×
- Patel v. PatelSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2004-05-24· cited 145×
- Jackson v. SpeedSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1997-06-23· cited 128×
- Wooten v. WootenSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2005-06-06· cited 102×
- Griffith v. GriffithCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1998-10-12· cited 65×
- Pirri v. PirriCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2006-05-22· cited 44×
- Mictronics, Inc. v. South Carolina Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2001-06-04· cited 34×
- Bowers v. BowersCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1991-03-04· cited 29×
- Hickum v. HickumCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1995-10-30· cited 29×
- Pirayesh v. PirayeshCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2004-05-11· cited 23×
- Rouvet v. RouvetCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2010-06-22· cited 19×
- Cooper v. CooperCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1986-07-07· cited 17×
- Williams v. WatkinsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2009-07-13· cited 16×
- Ware v. WareSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2013-06-12· cited 16×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.