Supreme Court of South Carolina· 6/12/2013
Ware v. Ware
Citations
- 404 S.C. 1
- 743 S.E.2d 817
- 2013 WL 2631121
- 2013 S.C. LEXIS 134
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- \An abuse of discretion occurs when the order of the court is controlled by an error of law or whe[n] the order is based on factual findings that are without evidentiary support.\
- \An abuse of discretion occurs when the order of the court is controlled by an error of law or where the order is based on factual findings that are without evidentiary support.\
- \An abuse of discretion occurs when the order of the court is controlled by an error of law or where the order is based on factual findings that are without evidentiary support.\
- a court has no discretion to perpetuate a void judgment
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Beatty, Hearn, Kittredge, Only, Pleicones, Toal
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Stoney v. SRSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2017-12-20· cited 175×
- Hawkins v. SunTrust BankCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2016-04-06· cited 12×
- Stoney v. StoneyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2018-08-29· cited 12×
- Baker v. EricksonNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2022-07-07· cited 1×
- Hawkins v. SunTrust BankCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2016-05-04
- Nelson v. NelsonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2019-08-07
- Singh v. SinghCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2019-12-11
- Cone ex rel. Tower St. Capital Mgmt. v. HoodSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2018-12-18
Cites
25 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Insurance Corp. of Ireland v. Compagnie Des Bauxites De GuineeSupreme Court· 1982-06-01· cited 3,488×
- United States Ex Rel. Robinson Rancheria Citizens Council v. Borneo, Inc. Clear Lake Indian Bingo Ltd. American Arbitration Association Herman SchnerNinth Circuit· 1992-07-07· cited 1,018×
- Durfee v. DukeSupreme Court· 1963-12-02· cited 677×
- Baldwin v. Iowa State Traveling Men's Assn.Supreme Court· 1931-05-25· cited 549×
- BB & T v. TaylorSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2006-07-24· cited 70×
- Leventhal v. HarrelsonSupreme Court of Alabama· 1998-05-15· cited 34×
- McDaniel v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1996-11-25· cited 30×
- Hospitality Management Associates, Inc. v. Shell Oil Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2004-01-12· cited 27×
- Universal Benefits, Inc. v. McKinneyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2002-03-25· cited 19×
- Minorplanet Systems USA Ltd. v. American Aire, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2006-03-13· cited 16×
- Thoma v. ThomaNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1996-12-24· cited 16×
- Anthony H. v. MATTHEW G.Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2012-03-16· cited 14×
- Coleman v. ColemanCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 2003-05-09· cited 9×
- Law Firm of Paul L. Erickson, P.A. v. BoykinSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2009-07-27· cited 6×
- Hennessee v. STATE EX REL. STATE OF TEX.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 1994-07-15· cited 4×
- Fuller v. FullerCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 2010-06-11· cited 4×
- Burke v. BurkeCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 2001-10-26· cited 4×
- Pitts v. FinkCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2010-08-24· cited 3×
- Orban v. OrbanCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 2012-11-16· cited 3×
- Elkins v. WestCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1977-07-26· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.