· 11/2/1988
Neil v. Allstate Insurance
Citations
- 549 A.2d 1304
- 379 Pa. Super. 299
- 1988 Pa. Super. LEXIS 3187
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Where coverage is clearly worded and conspicously displayed, failure to read a limitation or to understand it is no defense.”
- “[T]he effect of exclusionary provisions such as the one here at issue is to make available to consumers homeowners’ insurance at competitive premium rates.”
- “Unlike the area of automobile insurance, which is legislatively regulated, there is no legislative enactment in Pennsylvania governing or requiring that insurance companies provide a specified level of insurance coverage to homeowners.”
- finding the application of household exclusion valid
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cirillo, Tamilia, Cercone
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.