Skip to main content
· 11/2/1988

Neil v. Allstate Insurance

Citations

  • 549 A.2d 1304
  • 379 Pa. Super. 299
  • 1988 Pa. Super. LEXIS 3187

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Where coverage is clearly worded and conspicously displayed, failure to read a limitation or to understand it is no defense.”
  • “[T]he effect of exclusionary provisions such as the one here at issue is to make available to consumers homeowners’ insurance at competitive premium rates.”
  • “Unlike the area of automobile insurance, which is legislatively regulated, there is no legislative enactment in Pennsylvania governing or requiring that insurance companies provide a specified level of insurance coverage to homeowners.”
  • finding the application of household exclusion valid

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cirillo, Tamilia, Cercone

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.