Skip to main content
· 6/28/1984

Guardian Life Insurance Co. of America v. Zerance

Citations

  • 479 A.2d 949
  • 505 Pa. 345
  • 1984 Pa. LEXIS 302

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a court “may not rewrite the insurance contract, under the guise of judicial interpretation”
  • construing a similar medical insurance termination provision and extended loss provision to operate in this fashion
  • construing a similar medical insurance termination provision and extended loss provision to operate in this fashion
  • “Public policy is to be ascertained by reference to the laws and legal precedents and not from general considerations of supposed public interest”
  • clear provisions of termination clause in question were part of insurance contract and permitted termination of coverage, upon notice, after the covered disability was incurred, but only upon express notice
  • clear provisions of termination clause in question were part of insurance contract and permitted termination of coverage, upon notice, after the covered disability was incurred, but only upon express notice

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Nix, Larsen, Flaherty, McDer-mott, Hutchinson, Zappala, Papadakos

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.