Whole Enchilada, Inc. v. Travelers Property Casualty Co. of America

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that an endorsement is clearly intended to change an insurance policy where it unambiguously stated as much
• stating “[u]nder Pennsylvania law, an endorsement ‘will be considered part of the insurance contract if it appears that the parties intended that is should be so considered’” (quoting Young v. U. S. Fid. & Guar. Co., 445 A.2d 542, 544 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1982)
• “Under Pennsylvania law, interpretation of an insurance contract is a question of law that is properly decided by the court.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).