· 9/6/1984
State Farm General Insurance v. Emerson
Citations
- 687 P.2d 1139
- 102 Wash. 2d 477
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding intra-family exclusion in homeowner’s policy was unambiguous
- insurance policies are to be construed as contracts, and interpretation is a matter of law
- family exclusion applying equally to all family members including spouse, did not discriminate based on marital status
- family exclusion applying equally to all family members including spouse, did not discriminate based on marital status
- “Insurance policies are to be construed as contracts, and interpretation is a matter of law.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Utter
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.