Skip to main content

Boyd v. State

Citations

  • 776 So. 2d 317
  • 2001 WL 6177

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding presentence investigation report offered to prove appellant's release date from prison was insufficient because it constituted inadmissible hearsay
  • reversing and remanding for resen-tencing, where the evidence was insufficient to prove defendant’s release date from prison
  • resentencing ordered where State's evidence was insufficient to establish release date
  • \[T]he state must provide record evidence of ... the date the defendant was released from any prison term or supervision imposed for the last felony conviction.\
  • even though defense counsel admitted that defendant qualified as a habitual offender and did not dispute such finding in the presentence investigation report, it was the state's burden to prove certain requirements for defendant to qualify as habitual offender
  • Lowenthal v. State, 699 So.2d 319 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Shahood

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

18 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.