Great Old Broads for Wildernes v. Abigail Kimbell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the court must defer to Forest Service's interpretation of INFISH standards \unless it is plainly erroneous or inconsistent with the standard\
• observing APA and agency statutory and regulatory provisions require administrative exhaustion prior to bringing a NEPA claim
• comparing a final EIS to the 15 ROD and finding no supplementation was required under NEPA
• finding supplementation was not required where “the 16 Selected Alternative is primarily made of elements from Alternatives 1, 3, and 4 that were 17 analyzed—as elements—in the final EIS.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).