D.C. Circuit· 3/12/1999
Frugone v. Central Intelligence Agency
Citations
- 169 F.3d 772
- 335 U.S. App. D.C. 144
- 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 3951
- 1999 WL 129173
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that disclosures are not “official” when “made by someone other than the agency from which the information is being sought”
- holding that official disclosure must be from “agency from which the information is being sought”
- stating that, “mindful that courts have little expertise in either international 5 diplomacy or counterintelligence operations, we are in no position to dismiss the CIA’s facially reasonable concerns” regarding harm that disclosure could cause to national security
- refusing to “treat the statements of the [Office of 10 Personnel Management] . . . as tantamount to an official statement of 11 the CIA”
- upholding the CIA’s Glomar response despite official disclosure of the same information by the Office of Personnel Management
- upholding the CIA's Glomar response despite official disclosure of the same information by the Office of Personnel Management
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Ginsburg, Henderson, Tatel
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
83 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Students Against Genocide v. Department of StateD.C. Circuit· 2001-08-07· cited 535×
- Mobley v. Central Intelligence AgencyD.C. Circuit· 2015-11-13· cited 226×
- American Civil Liberties Union v. Central Intelligence AgencyD.C. Circuit· 2013-03-15· cited 178×
- National Security Counselors v. Central Intelligence AgencyDistrict of Columbia· 2012-10-17· cited 130×
- People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals v. National Institutes of Health, Department of Health & Human ServicesD.C. Circuit· 2014-03-14· cited 118×
- Electronic Privacy Information Center v. National Security AgencyD.C. Circuit· 2012-05-11· cited 91×
- Valfells v. Central Intelligence AgencyDistrict of Columbia· 2010-06-17· cited 89×
- Moore v. Central Intelligence AgencyD.C. Circuit· 2011-12-20· cited 74×
- Marino v. Drug Enforcement AdministrationD.C. Circuit· 2012-07-13· cited 68×
- Wilson v. Central Intelligence AgencySecond Circuit· 2009-11-12· cited 65×
- Mobley v. Central Intelligence AgencyDistrict of Columbia· 2013-02-07· cited 64×
- Florez v. Central Intelligence AgencySecond Circuit· 2016-07-14· cited 58×
- Coldiron v. United States Department of JusticeDistrict of Columbia· 2004-03-02· cited 40×
- Wheeler v. Central Intelligence AgencyDistrict of Columbia· 2003-06-04· cited 37×
- Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University v. CIAD.C. Circuit· 2021-08-27· cited 34×
- American Immigration Lawyers Association v. United States Department of Homeland SecurityDistrict of Columbia· 2012-03-30· cited 33×
- Mahmoud Cherif Bassiouni v. Central Intelligence AgencySeventh Circuit· 2005-02-01· cited 32×
- American Civil Liberties Union v. Department of DefenseS.D. New York· 2005-09-29· cited 24×
- Shapiro v. Central Intelligence AgencyDistrict of Columbia· 2016-03-17· cited 22×
- In re SealedD.C. Circuit· 2019-07-30· cited 21×
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Military Audit Project, Felice D. Cohen, Morton H. Halperin v. William Casey, Director of Central IntelligenceD.C. Circuit· 1981-05-04· cited 1,309×
- Alan L. Fitzgibbon v. Central Intelligence Agency Alan L. Fitzgibbon v. Central Intelligence AgencyD.C. Circuit· 1990-08-14· cited 423×
- Harriet Ann Phillippi v. Central Intelligence Agency and George H. Bush, Director, Central Intelligence AgencyD.C. Circuit· 1976-11-24· cited 354×
- Nassar Afshar v. Department of StateD.C. Circuit· 1983-03-15· cited 325×
- Harrison E. Salisbury v. United States of AmericaD.C. Circuit· 1982-09-21· cited 117×
- Phillippi v. Central Intelligence AgencyD.C. Circuit· 1981-06-25· cited 78×
- Alfred A. Knopf, Inc. v. ColbyFourth Circuit· 1975-02-07· cited 77×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.