· 11/18/1999
Perkins v. Harris
Citations
- 720 N.E.2d 1131
- 308 Ill. App. 3d 1076
- 242 Ill. Dec. 176
- 1999 Ill. App. LEXIS 800
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that a videotaped deposition played for the jury was “necessarily used at trial” because the physician’s demanding surgery schedule prevented him from testifying at the trial
- finding that a videotaped deposition played for the jury was \necessarily used at trial\ because the physician's demanding surgery schedule prevented him from testifying at the trial
- defendant’s appeal, apparently filed 30 days after the motion for costs, found to be timely
- evidence deposition was \necessarily used at trial\ because the physician's demanding schedule did not allow him to testify
- evidence deposition was \necessarily used at trial\ because the physician's demanding schedule did not allow him to testify
- defendant's appeal, apparently filed 30 days after the motion for costs, found to be timely
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hopkins
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.