Skip to main content
· 11/18/1999

Perkins v. Harris

Citations

  • 720 N.E.2d 1131
  • 308 Ill. App. 3d 1076
  • 242 Ill. Dec. 176
  • 1999 Ill. App. LEXIS 800

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that a videotaped deposition played for the jury was “necessarily used at trial” because the physician’s demanding surgery schedule prevented him from testifying at the trial
  • finding that a videotaped deposition played for the jury was \necessarily used at trial\ because the physician's demanding surgery schedule prevented him from testifying at the trial
  • defendant’s appeal, apparently filed 30 days after the motion for costs, found to be timely
  • evidence deposition was \necessarily used at trial\ because the physician's demanding schedule did not allow him to testify
  • evidence deposition was \necessarily used at trial\ because the physician's demanding schedule did not allow him to testify
  • defendant's appeal, apparently filed 30 days after the motion for costs, found to be timely

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hopkins

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.