District Court of Appeal of Florida· 5/21/2014
S.M. v. State
Citations
- 138 So. 3d 1156
- 2014 WL 2103374
- 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 7630
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- applicability of rule 8.100 is reviewed de novo
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Levine, Warner
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. AndersonSupreme Court of Florida· 1989-01-26· cited 72×
- Croom v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-04-09· cited 20×
- Shepard v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-10-18· cited 20×
- Papageorge v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-03-18· cited 15×
- M.A.L. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-03-27· cited 15×
- Blackshear v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-10-18· cited 12×
- T.A.S. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-02-18· cited 12×
- Josephs v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-05-09· cited 11×
- McNealy v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1985-10-16· cited 10×
- RR v. PortesyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-01-03· cited 9×
- Nagel v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-05-17· cited 8×
- J.R. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-04-04· cited 6×
- Russell v. McQueenDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-06-21· cited 5×
- Davis v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-02-02· cited 4×
- Taylor v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-02-28· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.