· 3/31/2000
Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Henney
Citations
- 94 F. Supp. 2d 36
- 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6157
- 2000 WL 424204
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that “this argument inspired ‘laughter’ and jest from the [Mova] appeals court”
- finding the interpretation arbitrary and capricious because based upon “internally inconsistent • reasoning” without “cogent explanation”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Urbina
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.