Skip to main content
· 3/31/2000

Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Henney

Citations

  • 94 F. Supp. 2d 36
  • 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6157
  • 2000 WL 424204

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that “this argument inspired ‘laughter’ and jest from the [Mova] appeals court”
  • finding the interpretation arbitrary and capricious because based upon “internally inconsistent • reasoning” without “cogent explanation”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Urbina

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.