Skip to main content
· 4/16/1923

Prendergast v. New York Telephone Co.

Citations

  • 262 U.S. 43
  • 43 S. Ct. 466
  • 67 L. Ed. 853
  • 1923 U.S. LEXIS 2610

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • temporary rates set by order of agency may be enjoined, where confiscatory, pending continuance and completion of the ratemaking process where no early date had been set for final hearing
  • temporary rates set by order of agency may be enjoined, where confiscatory, pending continuance and completion of the rate-making process where no early date had been set for final hearing
  • 7-month delay in granting rate increases, coupled with prospect for further delay
  • 7-month delay in granting rate increases, coupled with prospect for further delay

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sanford

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.