· 4/16/1923
Prendergast v. New York Telephone Co.
Citations
- 262 U.S. 43
- 43 S. Ct. 466
- 67 L. Ed. 853
- 1923 U.S. LEXIS 2610
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- temporary rates set by order of agency may be enjoined, where confiscatory, pending continuance and completion of the ratemaking process where no early date had been set for final hearing
- temporary rates set by order of agency may be enjoined, where confiscatory, pending continuance and completion of the rate-making process where no early date had been set for final hearing
- 7-month delay in granting rate increases, coupled with prospect for further delay
- 7-month delay in granting rate increases, coupled with prospect for further delay
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Sanford
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.