Skip to main content
· 11/30/1908

Prentis v. Atlantic Coast Line Co.

Citations

  • 211 U.S. 210
  • 29 S. Ct. 67

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • indicating that a state is constitutionally permitted to vest legislative and judicial powers in the same body
  • distinguishing between legislative and adjudicative functions; legislative-type proceedings of state administrative agency not entitled to res judicata effect
  • distinguishing between legislative and adjudicative functions; legislative-type proceedings of state administrative agency not entitled to res judicata effect
  • assuming, arguendo, that State Corporation Commission could be a court if its action had been judicial in nature, in which event it \would be protected from interference on the part of courts of the United States\
  • assuming, arguendo, that State Corporation Commission could be a court if its action had been judicial in nature, in which event it “would be protected from interference on the part of courts of the United States”
  • “The establishment of a rate is the making of a rule for the future, and therefore is an act legislative, not judicial, in kind.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Holmes

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.