Rogers v. Hill

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that 25 recovery equal to 30% of defendant’s maximum potential liability was not, considering 26 the circumstances of the case, an exceptional result
• approving of settlement under Rule 23 of representing 18 between 30% and 57% of maximum recovery, based on each party’s calculation
• reducing proposed incentive payments of $7,500, representing 21 1.8% of the total settlement amount, to $2,500 where the class members would receive an 22 average of $65.79

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).