Skip to main content

Murray v. State

Citations

  • 12 P.3d 784
  • 2000 Alas. App. LEXIS 168
  • 2000 WL 1646780

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that “while it is the better practice to make express findings, they may be implicit in a court's ruling”
  • “Whether a defendant consented to a search is a question of fact to be determined by the trial court from the totality of the circumstances in each case. We must accept the superior court’s findings on consent unless they are clearly erroneous.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Coats, Mannheimer, Stewart

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.