Moreau v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• ruling that errors requiring the suppression of evidence may not be raised for the first time on appeal unless they are singularly egregious
• holding that, absent exceptional circumstances, potential violations of the Fourth Amendment will not be treated as \plain error\
• holding that Fourth Amendment claims can not be raised for the first time on appeal
• holding that a codefendant voluntarily waived his Sixth Amendment right to individual counsel but requiring trial courts to apply stricter standards for dual representation in future cases, modeled after Minnesota precedent
• finding that failure to assert Fourth Amendment claim at trial amounts to waiver absent an egregious violation
• barring egregious circumstances, search and seizure violations can not be raised on appeal if they were not raised in the trial court

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).