Murray v. Greenwich Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a substantially similar exclusion applied because plaintiff would not have suffered any injury but for misappropriation of funds
• recognizing that “arising out of” generally connotes “but for causation”
• “The phrase 'arising out of ... has been accorded an equally broad reading when used in an exclusion to limit coverage.”
• in general-insurance context, “arising out of’ does not require proximate cause
• “but for” causation is sufficient in general insurance context

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).