Dexon Computer, Inc. v. Travelers Prop. Cas. Co. Am.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a special election was required because one candidate engaged in “a deliberate series of actions . . . making it impossible to determine the candidate who received the highest number of legal votes cast in the election”
• stating that “dismissal with prejudice was not the appropriate remedy for ... noncompliance with” Appellate Rule 9.
• stating that “dismissal with prejudice was not the appropriate remedy for . . . noncompliance with” Appellate Rule 9.
• holding \that the results of an election contested ... may not be set aside and a special election ordered unless the deliberate acts or series of actions succeed in substantially undermining the reliability of the election and the trustworthiness of its outcome\
• defining “injury” as “an act that damages, harms, Indiana Supreme Court | Case No. 23S-CT-277 | January 9, 2025 Page 7 of 34 or hurts”
• finding “pervasive and widespread deliberate conduct that perverted the absentee voting process and compromised the integrity and results of th[e] election” (internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).