Waseca Mutual Insurance Co. v. Noska

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Coverage cannot be defeated simply because a separate excluded risk constitutes an additional cause of the injury.”
• use-of-motor-vehicle exclusion applies to fire caused by burning embers in back of pickup truck, but claims covered because fire also independently caused by act of placing embers in truck
• finding \two distinct acts\ on the part of the insured

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).