IPSCO Tubulars, Inc. v. Ajax TOCCO Magnathermic Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• remanding with instructions to “enter findings of fact and conclusions of law that enable this court to review [the district court’s] -18- decision”
• “The Arkansas cases . . . do not establish reliance as essential to a contractual warranty claim.”
• “The Arkansas cases . . . do not establish reliance as essential to a contractual warranty claim.” (emphasis added)
• Consequen- tial damages in a breach of contract action are a question of fact

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).