· 7/1/1985
Murdock-Bryant Construction, Inc. v. Pearson
Citations
- 703 P.2d 1197
- 146 Ariz. 48
- 1985 Ariz. LEXIS 222
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- describing the essence of the inquiry as whether, under the facts, the defendant received a benefit that is unjust to retain without compensating the plaintiff for the value received
- “A person who has been unjustly enriched at the expense of another is required to make restitution to the other.” (quoting Restatement (First) of Restitution (“Restatement”) § 1 (1937))
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Feldman, Holohan, Gordon, Hays, Cameron
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.