Skip to main content
· 7/1/1985

Murdock-Bryant Construction, Inc. v. Pearson

Citations

  • 703 P.2d 1197
  • 146 Ariz. 48
  • 1985 Ariz. LEXIS 222

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • describing the essence of the inquiry as whether, under the facts, the defendant received a benefit that is unjust to retain without compensating the plaintiff for the value received
  • “A person who has been unjustly enriched at the expense of another is required to make restitution to the other.” (quoting Restatement (First) of Restitution (“Restatement”) § 1 (1937))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Feldman, Holohan, Gordon, Hays, Cameron

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.