Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Sales, Inc. v. Avondale Shipyards, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that an antitrust suit may be brought more than four years after events that initially gave rise to action where, among other grounds, there exists “continuing conspiracy or continuing violation”
• conspiring defendants’ continuing receipt of benefits from illegal contract does not create new causes of action
• stating that “motions to strike a defense are generally disfavored”
• striking antitrust defense as insufficient as a matter of law because it did not apply to plaintiff’s underlying action
• striking a defense as insufficient as a matter of law because it did not apply to the underlying action
• striking defense as insufficient as a matter of law because it did not apply to plaintiff’s underlying action

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).