Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
Fifth Circuit· 7/21/2023

Mueck v. La Grange Acquisitions

Citations

  • 75 F.4th 469

Oral argument

Source: CourtListener oral-argument corpus (CC0).

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that “an impairment need not be ‘permanent or long- term’ to qualify as a disability”
  • “Determining whether a plaintiff has a disability requires an individual assessment of the impact of the impairment on an individual’s major life activities.”
  • “tak[ing] the opportunity to acknowledge, as our sister circuits have, that, following the ADAAA’s passage, an impairment need not be ‘permanent or long-term’ to qualify as a disability”
  • “tak[ing] the opportunity to acknowledge, as our sister circuits have, that, following the ADAAA’s passage, an impairment need not be ‘permanent or long-term’ to qualify as a disability”
  • employee’s binge drinking substantially impacted the “major life activities of thinking, concentrating, and caring for” oneself
  • “Failure to request an accommodation, particularly where an employee’s disability is not obvious, will doom a claim.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

36 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Mueck v. La Grange Acquisitions

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.