Griffin v. United Parcel Service, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that no reasonable juror could find the employer had not engaged in the interactive process in good faith though employer had asked for further documentation to establish employee’s disability
• granting summary judgment for employer where “no reasonable juror could conclude that [employer] was unwilling to, in good faith, participate in an interactive process to reasonably accommodate [plaintiff]’s needs”
• granting summary judgment for employer where “no reasonable juror could conclude that [employer] was unwilling to, in good faith, participate in an interactive process to reasonably accommodate [plaintiffl’s needs”
• collecting cases and concluding that a plaintiff whose diabetes treatment requires “only modest dietary and lifestyle changes” failed even to raise an issue as to whether he was disabled under the ADA
• employee failed to provide information to show that his requested accommodation was necessary to manage his diabetes
• \None of the information Griffin provided UPS indicated that his requested accommodation was necessary for the management of his diabetes\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).