Skip to main content
Second Circuit· 3/27/2017

Mount v. Pulsepoint, Inc.

Citations

  • 684 F. App'x 32

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding no conflict between New Jersey and New York law with respect to unjust enrichment and that “plaintiffs” failure to allege specific loss or deprivation of opportunity to profit from [personal] information warranted dismissal of their [unjust enrichment] claim”
  • “plaintiffs do not allege that PulsePoint’s data collection practices actually deprived them of any opportunity to sell their own personalized information”
  • defendant’s unauthorized access and monitoring of plaintiffs’ web-browsing activity comprised injury-in-fact

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Carney, Livingston, Raggi

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.