Third Circuit· 11/10/2015

In Re Google Inc. Cookie Placement Consumer Privacy Litigation

Citations

806 F.3d 125
2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 19581
2015 WL 6875340

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

finding that storage in a web browser on a personal computer is not “[temporary storage incidental to, transmission” within the meaning of the SCA
stating that it is the “specific congressional intent to deal with the particular problem of private communications in network service providers’ possession”
concluding the plaintiff’s CIPA claim failed for the same reasons its Federal Wiretap Act claim failed
defining the parties to a communication as “the speaker and/or sender, and at least one intended recipient”
dismissing claims under the CFAA, UCL, and CCDAFA for lack of Article III standing
rejecting the plaintiffs’ argument that they suffered loss under the CDAFA through the defendants’ “capturing and making economic use of [the plaintiffs’ personally identifiable information]” thus “depriving the plaintiffs of their own ability to sell their internet usage information”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Fuentes, Fisher, Krause

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

33 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

44 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named In Re Google Inc. Cookie Placement Consumer Privacy Litigation

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.