Skip to main content
C.D. California· 12/20/2001

Motus v. Pfizer Inc.

Citations

  • 196 F. Supp. 2d 984
  • 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24281
  • 2001 WL 1792433

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Pfizer tacitly concedes for purposes of this summary judgment motion that its warning about the risk of suicide was inadequate.”
  • Under California law, “[a] plaintiff asserting causes of action based on a failure to warn must prove not only that no warning was provided or the warning was inadequate . . .”
  • “A plaintiff 9 asserting causes of action based on a failure to warn must prove not only that no warning 10 was provided or the warning was inadequate, but also that the inadequacy or absence of 11 the warning caused the plaintiff's injury.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Matz

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

24 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

30 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Motus v. Pfizer Inc.

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.