Flora Motus v. Pfizer Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming summary judgment on a failure- 7 to-warn claim where the “[plaintiff] failed to establish proof that stronger warnings 8 would have changed her husband’s medical treatment”
• “[Defendant] may prevail in its motion for summary 2 judgment if [plaintiff] has failed to adduce evidence that [the prescribing physician] 3 would have acted differently had [defendant] provided an adequate warning . . . .”
• “Because the doctor 19 testified that he did not read the warning label that accompanied Zoloft or rely on 20 information provided by Pfizer’s detail men before prescribing the drug to Mr. Motus, the 21 adequacy of Pfizer’s warnings is irrelevant to the disposition of this case.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).