Dorsett v. Sandoz, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• alleging the defendant should have provided “a stronger warning regarding the association between fluoxetine and suicidality through a variety of mediums, including but not limited to labeling, continuing education, symposiums, posters, advertisements”
• “A mere possibility that the FDA might not have allowed an enhanced suicidality warning for Prozac, despite allowing it for Effexor and Paxil, is not enough to warrant preemption.”
• theoretical assumptions regarding what FDA may have done is not enough to warrant preemption
• defining Major Depressive Disorder as MDD

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).