Court of Appeals of Maryland· 11/26/2003

Mosley v. State

Citations

836 A.2d 678
378 Md. 548
2003 Md. LEXIS 763

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

explaining that a postconviction proceeding is one vehicle for obtaining collateral review of a conviction
noting that “the adversarial process found in a post-conviction proceeding generally is the preferable method in order to evaluate counsel’s performance, as it reveals facts, evidence, and testimony that may be unavailable to an appellate court using only the original trial record”
“Integral to [the right to counsel under Maryland law] is the right to effective assistance of counsel.”
“When a defendant is denied effective assistance of counsel, it is the integrity of the adversarial process that is compromised.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Battaglia, Wilner

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

42 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

52 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.