Skip to main content
· 7/24/1997

United States v. Andre Cardell King, United States of America v. Chalmers Lavette Hendricks

Citations

  • 119 F.3d 290
  • 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 18965

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that while district court must main- tain impartiality, it may still interrogate witnesses as necessary to ensure proper development of the facts
  • even though North Carolina law permits a convicted felon to possess a firearm and ammunition in his home, “[w]hen civil rights have not been restored, the [state law] right to possess a firearm is immaterial”
  • “[I]t is well settled that a claim of ineffective assistance should be raised in a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion in the district court rather than on direct appeal, unless the record conclusively shows ineffective assistance.”
  • discussing the obligation to do so as “well settled”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hamilton, Niemeyer, Wilkins

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.