United States v. Larry D. Hughes

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that, except in unusual circumstances, claims of ineffective assistance of counsel are more appropriately raised in collateral proceedings
• indicating that ineffective-assistance claims are more properly raised in collateral proceedings
• noting that ineffective-assistance claims are more properly reviewed in collateral proceedings
• when claims of ineffective assistance of trial counsel are asserted on direct appeal, appellate court ordinarily defers them to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 proceedings
• “Except where a miscarriage of justice would obviously result or the outcome would be inconsistent with substantial justice, ineffective assistance of counsel issues are more appropriately raised in collateral proceedings . . . .” (quotation omitted)
• ineffective-assistance claim is more properly reviewed in habeas proceedings

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).