Skip to main content

Mortimer v. State

Citations

  • 100 So. 3d 99
  • 2012 WL 3711413
  • 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 14492

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the application of a procedural rule of evidence to events that occurred before the effective date of the statute did not violate the prohibition against applying laws ex post facto
  • finding a remand unnecessary where trial court under a newly adopted procedural statute would reach the same result

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gross, Levine, Robin, Rosenberg

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.