Skip to main content

Browne v. State

Citations

  • 132 So. 3d 312
  • 2014 WL 223094
  • 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 585
  • 39 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 201

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that “adoption of the Florida Evidence Code eliminated any common law hearsay exceptions not codified” and that common-law fresh-complaint rule is no longer a valid exception to prohibition on admitting hearsay testimony
  • “The standard of review for admissibility of evidence is abuse of discretion, limited by the rules of evidence.... Thus, whether evidence is admissible ... under an exception to the hearsay rule is a question of law ... subject to the de novo standard of review.”
  • “The standard of review for admissibility of evidence is abuse of discretion, limited by the rules of evidence. ... Thus, whether evidence is admissible ... under an exception to the hearsay rule is a question of law ... subject to the de novo standard of review.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gross, Levine, Warner

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.