Skip to main content

State v. Arthur

Citations

  • 390 So. 2d 717

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the State is held to a degree of proof greater than that required to establish guilt beyond a reasonable doubt
  • holding that, before pretrial detention may be ordered in a life felony case, State must show that \proof is evident or the presumption great\
  • holding that after considering the defendant’s responsive showing, the court finds that the proof is evident or the presumption great, the court then has the discretion to grant or deny bail
  • “The constitutional provision does not require that bail release be denied to all persons charged with capital offenses . . . .”
  • collects and analyzes cases from other states
  • “If, after considering the defendant’s responsive showing, the court finds that the proof is evident or the presumption great, the court then has the discretion to grant or deny bail. On this issue, the burden is on the accused to demonstrate that release on bail is appropriate.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Boyd

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

81 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.