Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 5/30/2003
Lewis v. State
Citations
- 889 So. 2d 623
- 2003 WL 21246584
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- when interpreting a rule of procedure, the wording of the rule must be given its plain meaning
- sexual intercourse with a corpse
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Shaw
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
73 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Gavin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2003-09-26· cited 135×
- Calhoun v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2005-04-29· cited 67×
- Lewis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2007-11-02· cited 64×
- Brooks v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2007-03-02· cited 63×
- Irvin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2005-06-24· cited 61×
- Lee v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2003-06-27· cited 61×
- Brown v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2007-06-29· cited 58×
- Morrow v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2004-08-27· cited 53×
- Barber v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2005-05-27· cited 45×
- McGowan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2005-07-08· cited 44×
- Thompson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2012-02-17· cited 43×
- Eggers v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2005-05-20· cited 42×
- McCray v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2010-12-17· cited 37×
- People v. GutierrezAppellate Court of Illinois· 2010-06-30· cited 36×
- Pilley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2005-05-27· cited 34×
- Billups v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama· 2010-12-30· cited 33×
- Scott v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2005-05-27· cited 32×
- Revis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2011-01-13· cited 31×
- Sale v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2008-04-04· cited 27×
- Yeomans v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2004-02-27· cited 27×
Cites
316 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1963-05-13· cited 33,902×
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court· 2000-06-26· cited 28,372×
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1967-03-27· cited 23,069×
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court· 1993-06-28· cited 21,376×
- Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1998-03-24· cited 12,622×
- Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1946-06-10· cited 7,845×
- Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court· 1986-04-07· cited 7,102×
- Brecht v. AbrahamsonSupreme Court· 1993-06-07· cited 7,022×
- Wainwright v. SykesSupreme Court· 1977-06-23· cited 6,068×
- Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court· 1991-05-20· cited 6,060×
- United States v. FradySupreme Court· 1982-05-24· cited 5,791×
- Lockett v. OhioSupreme Court· 1978-07-03· cited 5,026×
- United States v. YoungSupreme Court· 1985-02-20· cited 4,689×
- Ring v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 2002-06-24· cited 4,683×
- Frye v. United StatesD.C. Circuit· 1923-12-03· cited 4,204×
- Darden v. WainwrightSupreme Court· 1986-09-03· cited 4,161×
- Donnelly v. DeChristoforoSupreme Court· 1974-05-13· cited 3,922×
- Atkins v. VirginiaSupreme Court· 2002-06-20· cited 3,384×
- Eddings v. OklahomaSupreme Court· 1982-01-19· cited 3,271×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.