Tex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 8/31/1988
Morrow v. State
Citations
- 757 S.W.2d 484
- 1988 Tex. App. LEXIS 2238
- 1988 WL 90322
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- court upheld search of closed items in suitcase where appellant voluntarily consented to search of suitcase
- even in the absence of consent to search, a drug detection dog’s “alert” to the presence of narcotics in defendant’s luggage would have justified the arrest of appellant
- police officer testimony relevant to show that the defendant possessed more cocaine than is normal if it is intended for personal use
- even in the absence of consent to search, a drug detection dog’s “alert” to the presence of narcotics in defendant’s luggage justified the arrest of appellant
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bass, Levy, Stephanow
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
38 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Perez v. StateTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 1991-10-10· cited 61×
- Gamble v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1989-12-21· cited 53×
- State v. StatenNebraska Supreme Court· 1991-05-03· cited 46×
- Dawson v. StateTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2003-06-13· cited 35×
- King v. StateTex. App. Ct., 10th Dist. (Waco)· 2004-01-21· cited 20×
- State v. HamlinCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1994-02-17· cited 20×
- Arevalo v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1992-06-18· cited 12×
- McHenry v. StateTex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 1992-04-01· cited 11×
- Carl Allen Carter v. StateTex. App. Ct., 7th Dist. (Amarillo)· 2009-04-01· cited 7×
- Melugin v. StateTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 1999-04-15· cited 6×
- State v. StatenNebraska Supreme Court· 1989-11-17· cited 3×
- Melugin v. StateTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 1995-08-24· cited 3×
- Wooden v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1994-08-31· cited 2×
- State v. HamlinCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1994-01-20· cited 1×
- Guyton v. StateTex. App. Ct., 10th Dist. (Waco)· 2008-11-05
- Boyd, Kendrick Lee v. StateTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2002-12-27
- Harris, Andre Lavelle v. StateTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2002-09-26
- Dawson, Claude Allen v. StateTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2003-05-08
- Oscar Osvaldo Duarte v. StateTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2006-04-20
- Paul Edward Hillman A/K/A Paul E. Hillman v. StateTex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2004-04-08
Cites
20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court· 1971-06-21· cited 9,038×
- Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court· 1983-03-23· cited 6,728×
- United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court· 1980-06-30· cited 6,313×
- United States v. JacobsenSupreme Court· 1984-04-02· cited 3,218×
- United States v. ChadwickSupreme Court· 1977-06-21· cited 2,561×
- Burdeau v. McDowellSupreme Court· 1921-06-01· cited 1,253×
- Todd v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1980-05-07· cited 378×
- McCullough v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1985-06-26· cited 334×
- Anderson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1982-03-03· cited 256×
- Melvin Corngold v. United StatesNinth Circuit· 1966-09-29· cited 202×
- Daniels v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1986-04-09· cited 174×
- Kolb v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1976-01-28· cited 146×
- Rumbaugh v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1982-03-03· cited 128×
- Blansett v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1977-09-14· cited 112×
- Evans v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1975-12-10· cited 55×
- Stewart v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1981-02-11· cited 54×
- United States v. Tommie Lee Newton and Willie StokesSeventh Circuit· 1975-06-18· cited 34×
- Pitts v. StateTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 1987-05-14· cited 29×
- Chaires v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1972-03-29· cited 19×
- United States v. KrellD. Alaska· 1975-02-19· cited 10×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.