Skip to main content

Morrow v. State

Citations

  • 757 S.W.2d 484
  • 1988 Tex. App. LEXIS 2238
  • 1988 WL 90322

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • court upheld search of closed items in suitcase where appellant voluntarily consented to search of suitcase
  • even in the absence of consent to search, a drug detection dog’s “alert” to the presence of narcotics in defendant’s luggage would have justified the arrest of appellant
  • police officer testimony relevant to show that the defendant possessed more cocaine than is normal if it is intended for personal use
  • even in the absence of consent to search, a drug detection dog’s “alert” to the presence of narcotics in defendant’s luggage justified the arrest of appellant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bass, Levy, Stephanow

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

38 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.