Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 12/17/1980
Gutierrez v. State
Citations
- 628 S.W.2d 57
- 1980 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1503
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that jury could reasonably infer from independent facts and circumstances that defendant knew of narcotic's existence
- concluding that jury could reasonably infer from independent facts and circumstances that defendant knew of drug's existence
- concluding that jury could reasonably infer from independent facts and circumstances that defendant knew of narcotic's existence
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Clinton, Onion, Douglas, Davis, Teague, Roberts
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
60 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Chambers v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1986-06-04· cited 291×
- Alexander v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1987-10-07· cited 252×
- Foster v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1989-06-28· cited 225×
- Maynard v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1985-02-20· cited 211×
- Trejo v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1989-02-22· cited 87×
- Gardner v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1985-10-02· cited 67×
- Edwards v. StateTex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 1991-10-16· cited 58×
- Wilson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1989-06-07· cited 52×
- Childress v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1990-01-17· cited 48×
- Foster v. StateTex. App. Ct., 9th Dist. (Beaumont)· 1991-08-28· cited 37×
- Korell v. StateTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2008-04-24· cited 34×
- Peterson v. StateTex. App. Ct., 8th Dist. (El Paso)· 1992-11-25· cited 32×
- Haddad v. StateTex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 1993-11-17· cited 27×
- Dowling v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1994-06-29· cited 24×
- Jones v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1988-12-14· cited 23×
- Ricondo v. StateTex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 1983-04-13· cited 22×
- Lavigne v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1989-11-09· cited 18×
- Solis v. StateTex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 1983-02-16· cited 18×
- Estrada v. StateTex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 1982-10-20· cited 17×
- Aguirre v. StateTex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 1984-11-30· cited 17×
Cites
36 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1969-01-27· cited 6,223×
- Esquivel v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1980-01-09· cited 256×
- Granviel v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1976-11-10· cited 244×
- Wygal v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1977-09-14· cited 194×
- Tarpley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1978-05-10· cited 163×
- Long v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1975-12-10· cited 129×
- Norman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1979-09-19· cited 120×
- Culmore v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1969-11-19· cited 102×
- Powell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1973-10-03· cited 84×
- Morrison v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1980-12-10· cited 82×
- Phoenix Refining Co. v. PowellCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1952-09-10· cited 72×
- Sewell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1979-03-14· cited 71×
- Urtado v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1980-09-17· cited 66×
- Cunningham v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1973-11-07· cited 65×
- Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1973-07-17· cited 48×
- Nathan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1981-01-21· cited 48×
- Brock v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1956-01-11· cited 46×
- Galvan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1979-04-18· cited 44×
- Moreno v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1976-09-15· cited 39×
- Passmore v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1976-12-08· cited 37×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.